What Does History Tell Us?
This is where it gets interesting.
The long-run historical average CAPE for the US S&P 500, going back to 1871, sits around 17. Readings above 25 have historically been considered expensive. Readings above 35 have been rare — and when they’ve occurred, they’ve almost always been followed by poor returns over the subsequent decade.
The CAPE hit its all-time record of 44.2 in late 1999 — right before the dot-com crash that wiped out nearly 50% of the S&P 500 and delivered a “lost decade” for equity investors.
Before the 2008 financial crisis, it sat at around 27.5. Not extreme, but elevated — and returns in the years that followed reflected that.
Where Are We Today?
As of June 2026, the US S&P 500 CAPE ratio stands at approximately 39.9.
To put that in context:
- It is nearly 2.5 times the long-run historical average of 17
- It has been this high on only one other occasion in 155 years of data — the dot-com bubble of 1999–2000
- It sits well above the long-term average of 32 even using more recent (post-1990) data
- It has risen over 10% in the past year alone
This is not a cause for immediate panic. High valuations do not tell you when the market will correct — only that the market is currently priced for near perfection. The margin for error is thin.
Why Is It So High?
There are legitimate arguments for why today’s CAPE might overstate the risk:
The composition of the market has changed. The S&P 500 is now dominated by large technology companies — Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Amazon — with higher profit margins and faster growth than the industrial companies that historically made up the index. Some analysts argue a structurally higher CAPE of 25–30 may be the “new normal”.
Passive investing has changed flows. Trillions of pounds and dollars now flow automatically into index funds regardless of valuation, which may support prices at higher levels than before.
Interest rates matter. When bonds pay very little, investors accept higher equity valuations. As rates have moved higher, this argument has weakened — but it hasn’t disappeared entirely.
These are reasonable points. But they are also the same arguments made in 1999. High valuations have a habit of reasserting themselves eventually.